Skip to main content

What's in a name?

Are you one of those multitudes of people who go crazy about the "brand" when you pick a T- shirt or a travel bag? Do you go for branded Australian apples from XXXX's Fresh or do you settle in for the less privileged but equally nutritious ones on the platforms of Madiwala market? Do you judge a book by the book-keeper's looks and diction? Do you buy a "Marks and Spencer" plain T shirt for a couple of grands with no negotiation, just return the wistful smile of the well-dressed hosts of M&S and yet argue at the top of your lungs for a couple of tens for the same kind but less dear T shirt with an under privileged platform-wala at Commercial Street? If you answer in the affirmative for any of these, then tell me why..


One reason springing up at the top of my mind is "Quality Assurance" - the phrase synonymous with brand. I'd anyday pick a Titan watch, spend a little more bucks and get the warranty and assurance of quality than one of those flashy non-branded cheaper ones available in the platforms. Most of us choose the branded counter-parts for electronic/electrical goods. But brands are so pervasive in our lives...from groceries to gloves..and where do we draw the line?

Why is the passion for a Samsonite travel bag that costs a fortune more than its non-branded equally good (??) counterparts so huge? Not to mention the Nike shoes , Provogue T shirts and Garnier body lotions? Is it that all the non-branded items are inferior in quality or that all the branded items meet up to the fortune that they cost?

And if you thought brands applied just to the products, think again...How many of us go to PVR and Inox cinemas, willingly spend more when the same movie is screened in less flashy theatres? How many students go to branded engineering and medical colleges for better recognition and career growth? Its the same syllabus after all...Do all branded institutions have the consumerate infrastructure or faculty? And how many of us travel miles to go to branded beauty salons when we could get the same service from an obscure but good salon next door? Brands just seem ubiquitous from pre-school to technical companies, from sanitary napkins to hair cremes.

To me, it is also seems like a kind of marketing strategy...the more unaffordable an item is seemed to look like, the more value it seems to carry, and it is sold like crazy among the "currency - creamy" population. To me, it seems like brands are a trap...And, if I sound like I've evaded the trap, well, no..am one of those vulnerable victims of the brand-game. I get an Australian apple from XXXX's Fresh, pay more for the AC charges and fight for five bucks with the platform-wala outside the shop for guavas. Am just wondering "What's in the name" that makes me and a few others do that (Hopefully I'm not the only one contributing madly the brand way to the Indian economic explosion)...If you have answers, please tell me why....

PS : A case in point (Thanks to Harish for the link)

Comments

Divya said…
:). Iam as brand conscious as it can get. I , for some reason have always preferred to shed that extra money to get a Ralph Lauren /Titan/ Lee/ Loreal, or whatever the brand it might be for even the little things that I buy. I always prefer to go to a supermarket to buy my groceries than to get it from the shopside walas. Well, it might be a mindset hard to get out of, but as you questioned, I dont see any reason other than 'quality assurance' for this mentality. And I have the blocked mindset that if i get something from the roadside, I wouldnt cherish it as I cherish the branded ones. I have tried a coupla times before to settle in for the non branded ones, and I really was disappointed and I dont think I will in the future get out of this mentality.
hariflute said…
I agree with what Divya said... On a related note, here is something I came across a couple of days before...
http://indianeconomy.org/2007/12/25/indias-retail-revolution-question-1/
http://indianeconomy.org/2007/12/30/indias-retail-revolution-question-2/
hey Nithya!

I'm equally brand conscious (but, not really for the apples/groceries)...For instance, I wud go for a Samsonite baggage (it really has its quality man, seriously!)... As Divya says, I have also tried some unbranded ones and was disappointed...So, why take a risk? :D Well, keep writing buddy!! :) Nice blog!
Subbu S said…
Depends.. you have to hear a Bose to justify the price tag and that said I have wondered how Coca-cola was able to sell carbonated water all these years at a ridiculous price.

The apple is worth the price and T-shirt is a rip-off
odyssey said…
Hmm.. Whats in a brand.. I have seen globus,levis t-shirts fade off after a few washes etc. As far as clothes are concerned, i forage around majestic and 4th block for good stuff. But for electronics , i would prefer going in for branded ones if they are not too costly.
Unknown said…
True. Branded products come with better quality assurance and branded products are more cherished. Also this generation loves to flaunt its wealth, and "branded" products are the means to show off the money! We belong to the "earn more, spend more, want more" generation who are infected by the "affluenza" virus :)
Lakshmi said…
Well, i go for branded products because it comes with a lot of trappings like a nice A/C showroom, less crowd, less haggling and shouting and overall a better shopping experience. When u can afford why compromise for crowded streets, irritated vendors and cramped spaces. Of course, as with everyone else I also 'seek refuge' under the 'Quality Assurance' banner :))!!!
Balaji said…
Actually, the brand mania is more in the upwardly mobile Indian middle class. Indian young urban class wants to show that it is different from the rest. Whereas, in the US a lot of people go for generics... most of Wal-mart stuff dont belong to the great brands...

Thus, I feel buying a brand is factor of one's self-perception and self-confidence.

Popular posts from this blog

Enchante, Mumbai!

  It has been roughly nine years since we landed in the city of dreams - the two of us with a one big suitcase each and one kid half-the size of a case. We walked into an empty apartment on the twelfth floor of a building on a hot June afternoon, physically exhausted, yet high in spirits (Age had not withered us then). Strangely, I seem to remember how the first day in Mumbai unfolded with a lot of detail - insignificant things like the first dress I wore in Mumbai, first road-side sandwich , the first shopping experience in the very Mumbai-sh "DMart", the first person I heard speaking in Tamil in a rather foreign place, the first maid I employed(who promptly quit on me), and of course, the first meal that we ordered (in a non-Swiggy era). Jhumpa Lahiri, in her Pulitzer winning collection "Interpreter of Maladies",  insinuates through one of her characters, who reminisces about his first day in America with a new wife - about how bizarre it is that the mundane first

Thillana Mohanambal.....

Here's some plain speaking ...I stay at Bangalore and yet I've never been any good with movies or with catching up with the latest releases. I can never be dedicated to any task for more than a few minutes, and being glued to the silver screen for two-and-a-half or three hours is not, in many cases, an exception. I do have quite a few English favorites though (This is affectionately called the UK effect by some of my team-mates). Given a choice, I would prefer the Tamil oldies to the latest Hindi or the regional masalas . And speaking of Tamil oldies, the one film that pops up in my mind is this evergreen classic Thillana Mohanambal .. It is truly a classic..not only because it is set in the early to mid nineteenth century or because it is of Eastman colour..but also because generations after generations, people (children and adults alike) have found pleasure in every scene of the movie..I've watched the movie a zillion times before and I can play the entire movie in my

Probability is God!!!

If you agree with this rather audacious claim, then you are either too wise to be reading this blog post or, you have probably read God's Debris and with the wisdom of common sense, you are willing to ponder about this statement, and its equally contentious converse - God is Probability!!! I am, as you may have guessed with my previous posts, not too wise. I happened to read God's Debris , and I happen to be common-sensical , and I coined these propositions. Here is the inductional hypothetical base upon which I try to prove these.. Probability is based on the law of averages . The probability of getting a head while tossing a coin is (1/2). Does it mean that when you toss a coin twice, you are guaranteed to get head once and a tail once? Not really!!! It means that when you toss a coin 100 times, you are likely to get heads 50 times and tails 50 times, and when you toss the same Godforbidden coin 1000 times, you are more likely to get heads 500 times and tails 500 times. P